About Me

Name: Giles Corey
Location: Clarksburg, MD
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

The Ever-so Dreamy Matt Damon and his Huge Brain

I live in the Washington DC area.  In the mornings on my commute I like to listen to a local radio show called the Junkies.  It is a group of 4 friends that are about my same age that rag on each other just like my friends do, they just get paid to do it.  Jason, Cakes, EB, and JP.  3 of the 4 Junkies are democrats, although I don't think that they have thought about their views just gone with ebb and flow of politics.  One of them is a conservative for the most part.

On MLK Day I was listening to a repeat performance.  The show was recorded prior to the election.  The Junkies interviewed Matt Damon, or brought him on to plug away for Obama.  Anyhow, the one conservative (forgive me I cannot remember which) asked Matt Damon, after his spiel, what change he was actually looking forward to if Obama was elected.  Damon couldn't give an answer.  He sounded like an idiot.  He was asked the same question again.  Damon went into a soliloquy about how his mother is in early childhood education (as if had any relevance) and that he and his wife had started their daughter in public school.  Apparently their daughter wasn't doing well in school and they met with the teacher about her progress.  The teacher told Damon and his wife that their daughter may be served better in a private school.  And Obama is going to stop that from happening to any more first graders.

Now I'm no big city lawyer, but this is a non-sequitor of the highest order.  It argues post hoc ergo proctor hoc in reverse.  First, the president has no power over how a child is taught in a local school.  And don't start crying to me about No Child Left Behind because it is a set of standards, not a set of curricula to be taught in school.  The local school board, and more directly the teacher, is responsible for the instruction and classroom management in a particular school.  The fact that Damon wants to blame President Bush for the fact that his daughter wasn't doing well in a public school overlooks the most likely culprits for her lack of success;  HER PARENTS.  I don't know their story, but I do have anectdotal evidence of my own where overactive and undisciplined children within my own family have learned to flourish within the public school environment.  Do you think that a first grade teacher had never seen a kid with an attention deficit or overactivity before?  You gotta be kidding me.

I guess it is OK to blame everything on President Bush.  If he can single-handedly destroy the planet, the Constitution, and our civil liberties he can definitely screw up a school in New Jersey or wherever they lived.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mumbai Disgrace

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/world-news/mumbai-photographer-i-wish-id-had-a-gun-not-a-camera-armed-police-would-not-fire-back-14086308.html

Read this article and tell me if the first thing that you want to do isn't to punch a Mumbai police officer in the face.

God bless America for still being able to produce sheepdogs to keep the wolves away.  As was said by the great Matthew McConaughey in "Reign of Fire", "Envy the country that has heroes, huh? I say pity the country that needs them."

I would hazard a guess that 80% of the NYPD would be running toward the assailants, not tucking tail and hiding behind a retaining wall. 

In a society where wearing a police uniform means nothing more than receiving a paycheck on the government dole, how can a citizen feel safe?  We are lucky to live in a society where there is still a group of people that is willing to put their lives on the line to protect the rest of us. 

The following is excerpted from Bill Whittle's essay "Tribes" at www.ejectejecteject.com :

A few weeks ago, a reader was kind enough to send me a link about a theory and seminar called The Bulletproof Mind, written by Lt. Colonel Dave Grossman. Just the small blurb I read enlarged my mental horizon by an order of magnitude, because it clarified many of the confusing things I have been feeling as so much of the country plunges deeper into irresponsibility, fantasy, bitterness and delusion.

I excerpt a small portion of it here, without permission, in the hope that those of you who are serious about surviving things like Katrina will go here and buy it.

Lt. Colonel Grossman, a far better man than me, a man who does things I only talk about, writes in his introduction to The Bulletproof Mind:

One Vietnam veteran, an old retired colonel, once said this to me: "Most of the people in our society are sheep. They are kind, gentle, productive creatures who can only hurt one another by accident."

This is true. Remember, the murder rate is six per 100,000 per year, and the aggravated assault rate is four per 1,000 per year. What this means is that the vast majority of Americans are not inclined to hurt one another.

Some estimates say that two million Americans are victims of violent crimes every year, a tragic, staggering number, perhaps an all-time record rate of violent crime. But there are almost 300 million total Americans, which means that the odds of being a victim of violent crime is considerably less than one in a hundred on any given year. Furthermore, since many violent crimes are committed by repeat offenders, the actual number of violent citizens is considerably less than two million.

Thus there is a paradox, and we must grasp both ends of the situation: We may well be in the most violent times in history, but violence is still remarkably rare. This is because most citizens are kind, decent people who are not capable of hurting each other, except by accident or under extreme provocation. They are sheep.

I mean nothing negative by calling them sheep. To me it is like the pretty, blue robin's egg. Inside it is soft and gooey but someday it will grow into something wonderful. But the egg cannot survive without its hard blue shell. Police officers, soldiers and other warriors are like that shell, and someday the civilization they protect will grow into something wonderful. For now, though, they need warriors to protect them from the predators.

"Then there are the wolves," the old war veteran said, "and the wolves feed on the sheep without mercy." Do you believe there are wolves out there who will feed on the flock without mercy? You better believe it. There are evil men in this world and they are capable of evil deeds. The moment you forget that or pretend it is not so, you become a sheep. There is no safety in denial.

"Then there are sheepdogs," he went on, "and I'm a sheepdog. I live to protect the flock and confront the wolf." Or, as a sign in one California law enforcement agency put it, "We intimidate those who intimidate others."

If you have no capacity for violence then you are a healthy productive citizen: a sheep. If you have a capacity for violence and no empathy for your fellow citizens, then you have defined an aggressive sociopath--a wolf. But what if you have a capacity for violence, and a deep love for your fellow citizens? Then you are a sheepdog, a warrior, someone who is walking the hero's path. Someone who can walk into the heart of darkness, into the universal human phobia, and walk out unscathed.

He continues:

Let me expand on this old soldier's excellent model of the sheep, wolves, and sheepdogs. We know that the sheep live in denial; that is what makes them sheep. They do not want to believe that there is evil in the world. They can accept the fact that fires can happen, which is why they want fire extinguishers, fire sprinklers, fire alarms and fire exits throughout their kids' schools. But many of them are outraged at the idea of putting an armed police officer in their kid's school. Our children are dozens of times more likely to be killed, and thousands of times more likely to be seriously injured, by school violence than by school fires, but the sheep's only response to the possibility of violence is denial. The idea of someone coming to kill or harm their children is just too hard, so they choose the path of denial.

The sheep generally do not like the sheepdog. He looks a lot like the wolf. He has fangs and the capacity for violence. The difference, though, is that the sheepdog must not, cannot and will not ever harm the sheep. Any sheepdog that intentionally harms the lowliest little lamb will be punished and removed. The world cannot work any other way, at least not in a representative democracy or a republic such as ours.

Still, the sheepdog disturbs the sheep. He is a constant reminder that there are wolves in the land. They would prefer that he didn't tell them where to go, or give them traffic tickets, or stand at the ready in our airports in camouflage fatigues holding an M-16. The sheep would much rather have the sheepdog cash in his fangs, spray paint himself white, and go, "Baa." Until the wolf shows up. Then the entire flock tries desperately to hide behind one lonely sheepdog. As Kipling said in his poem about "Tommy" the British soldier:

While it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that,
an' "Tommy, fall be'ind,"
But it's "Please to walk in front, sir,"
when there's trouble in the wind,
There's trouble in the wind, my boys,
there's trouble in the wind,
O it's "Please to walk in front, sir,"
when there's trouble in the wind.

Understand that there is nothing morally superior about being a sheepdog; it is just what you choose to be. Also understand that a sheepdog is a funny critter: He is always sniffing around out on the perimeter, checking the breeze, barking at things that go bump in the night, and yearning for a righteous battle. That is, the young sheepdogs yearn for a righteous battle. The old sheepdogs are a little older and wiser, but they move to the sound of the guns when needed right along with the young ones.

Here is how the sheep and the sheepdog think differently. The sheep pretend the wolf will never come, but the sheepdog lives for that day. After the attacks on September 11, 2001, most of the sheep, that is, most citizens in America said, "Thank God I wasn't on one of those planes." The sheepdogs, the warriors, said, "Dear God, I wish I could have been on one of those planes. Maybe I could have made a difference." When you are truly transformed into a warrior and have truly invested yourself into warriorhood, you want to be there. You want to be able to make a difference.

While there is nothing morally superior about the sheepdog, the warrior, he does have one real advantage -- only one. He is able to survive and thrive in an environment that destroys 98 percent of the population.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

November 22, 2008 -- Victory in Iraq Day

Join the VI day Movement.  November 22, 2008 will be declared by Zombie as Victory in Iraq Day.  VI Day November 22nd

The undead will declare this because neither the mainstream media, the outgoing administration, or the incoming administration will declare it for themselves.

So put it on you callendars.  Celebrate with a hoisted glass for our country and our soldiers.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Letting The Idiots Run The Assylum

Can you imagine allowing your adolescent, or younger, child make critical decisions concerning the running of your household?  How about having them evaluate your parenting, cooking, cleaning, or any other domestic work that you do and they don't.  No!
 
So my question to you is this, why would you want to have a teenager involved in the design of their curriculum or in the evaluation of the teachers? 
 
The argument to involve them in the curriculum design process poked its way into our local school system by use of the Baldridge process.  This process is used in large companies to gather information and ideas concerning the improvement of all aspects of a production process or a service provided to customers.  By gathering information from all portions of  the workforce, it is thought that, the process will be improved and the workers will all become happier.
 
When I heard that this was the way that our school system was going I was wondering... who were the groups?  Building services, cafeteria, PTA, booster?  Who?  The four groups involved would be the administration, the teachers, the parents, and the students.  So you have two groups of people who know little to nothing about the operation of a school involved in a round table with two who are.
 
I am not a surgeon.  I do not feel qualified enough to sit down with a surgeon and give him advice on how to run his operating room.
 
What grinds my gears the most about this is that parents are actually pushing for the involvement of their know-nothings in what they are taught.  This shows me that the old adage about an apple not falling far from the tree holds true.  By having this thought that "empowering" a young person to choose what they are taught will have a benefit shows the ignorance of the parents.  Fifteen year old kids don't know whats best for them.  If they did they wouldn't need parents.
 
The only thing that this would do is to erode the already crumbling wall of authority that teachers now hold.  If their statures drop any further the students will be teaching the classes with the teachers acting as referees.  I know I am exaggerating, but only a little bit. 
 
Here is a hypothetical to you.  Lets say that your son is a high school sophomore.  He hasn't taken Physics as of yet, but he is going to sit on a Baldridge team and decide what the major thematic units for this upcoming class should be.  How can he be an informed participant in this discussion?  Presumably he hasn't been exposed to this subject matter prior to this.  I see no constructive input this child can offer.
 
One of the parents introduced an idea to have high school students evaluate their teachers.  The evaluations wouldn't be used as a meterstick for their performance, it would just be nice to allow the students to express themselves.  GARBAGE!  I can see the constructive criticism that would come out of this.  Nasty epithets, ad hominem attacks, and overly emotional ratings would abound in these evaluations.  Students that have issues with teachers should voice them privately, face-to-face with the teacher to iron out whatever differences that there may be.  Saving your vitriol for an anonymous evaluation, especially when you have no constructive background on pedagogy or classroom management, would serve no purpose. 
 
Here's an idea for the evaluations.  How about the students write them and the parents of the students have to read them word for word in front of the entire staff, unedited.  I am sure that Mr. Jones would be so proud to read where his little darling had called his gym teacher a derrogatory term.
 
Parents.  Kids can be very smart.  Some can even understand the underlying meaning in everyday life.  But the majority of them don't know crap from crisco.  Students need to learn what is being taught to them.  Their input in an official process is neither needed nor constructive.  You are not doing them any favors by having them decide if learning the Pythagorean theory is necessary.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I called it first! Everyone is now married.

So the great state of California has decided to legalize a euphemism that has been named "same sex marriage".  A definition of marriage (albeit the third in the list) is:  the state of being husband and wife.  Now I am not going to get into a semantic argument over the definition of the word, but really!  Who is the husband and who is the wife in a same sex marriage.  Ok, so I made a semantic argument over the issue.  THAT IS HOW SILLY THE ISSUE IS.
 
The California supreme court has made a ruling that stands in the face of the referendum that was duly voted upon by the good citizens of California.  The Mayor of San Francisco has said that the Constitution is in place to protect the minority from the whim of the majority????  Pardon me, but this is a democracy.  51% is what is needed in most cases to pass a law by vote, not a cadre of judges looking down their noses at we simple minded chattel.  The enlightened Mayor also likened same sex marriage to inter-racial marriage and stated that he didn't think that inter-racial marriage would be approved by voters in present day California.  Elitist much?
 
Thank you so much for taking my hand and allowing me to see that all men are created equal, more equal if you are gay though.  I have a little problem with a small group of people telling the majority what they should recognize and what they shouldn't.  Objecting to the law is not a reason for not upholding a passed law, in fact it is the judge's jobs to enforce those laws passed either through the representative legislature or, in this case, referendum.
 
So lets lay this decision out for everyone to see.  The California state supreme court has decided that the law passed by the people of the State is unconstitutional.  This decision will undoubtedly go deeper than the "same sex" label that it has garnered.  The FLDSers in Texas, I am sure, would be interested in this decision.  What about the incestual couple in Australia.  Why wouldn't they want to move to California so they can drink from the trough of "same sex" marriage.  After all why wouldn't they want the equal protection that the state provides.  And why would they be able to prevent these "marriages"?  These people love each other.  Just because one group is more than two participants and one group is father and daughter shouldn't exclude them, should it?  Why?  Why not?  
 
I don't want to sound condescending to these well meaning gay people, but I most likely will.  You can call yourself married, you can go through the ceremony, you can wear the rings, you can even have children.  But, in my mind and in the majority of others in this great country you are not married.  I know that my friends get tired of my quoting a cartoon in serious debates like this, but in The Incredibles the evil Syndrome was attempting to market super power gadgets that would be available for purchase.  His idea was, since he has no super powers, to make everyone "super".  The argument being when everyone is super then nobody is super.  I see the same fate for marriage, when everyone is married then nobody is married.  It renders the term without meaning.  Sad.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Parental Narcisism

My poor wife is a public school teacher.  She has to deal with pubescent teenagers all day.  That in and of itself is bad, but its not the worst of it.  For the rest of the day she has to deal with the parents of these walking acne scars.

I want you to take a trip back in your time machine.  Remember that test in the eighth grade that you forgot to study for?  Remember how you freaked out and didn't finish the last 4 essay questions (they are called ECR's now).  Could you imagine going home to your parents and explain to them that you didn't finish your exam in the class period and that it was unfair that you couldn't take another class period to finish the test?  If I would have done that my parents would have realized that I hadn't acted responsibly in my academic endeavor and would have summarily given me the business (business end of a belt, wooden spoon, etc.).

Nowadays, if a student experiences a similar event the parent will fight tooth and nail to get their child a better grade.  Here is a message to all of you parents out there.  Your child is not a genius.  Your child isn't even smart enough to know what they don't know.  It is the teacher's job to impart that knowledge upon your child.  It is your job to instill a sense of academic responsibility and a work ethic that will benefit them in the future.  It is not your job to beg for fake grades so your child can get into Berkeley.  I would bet that a smaller, less expensive, school would do your selfish little darling better.  Especially when they flunk out.

I think that the most appalling aspect of this is the fact that a parent can pick up the phone and call the teacher directly.  Email is also a plague in my book.  Having to get up off of your seat and actually visit with a teacher used to act as a barrier between these overzealous parents, but now with on-line grading and email the barrage never ends.

Here is the bottom line.  Parents, you need to realize how stupid you were when you were in high school.  Just because your kid has access to the internet and can play video games doesn't mean that he is smarter than you were when you were his age.  Enforce the authority that a teacher has or should rightfully have.  Stop eroding away teacher's stature.  Realize that colleges don't make a good determination of the success level of your child.  Let your children grow up by taking some hard knocks. 
 
Even more than that, parents today have no sense of shame.  Everything is by the child, for the child, and of the child.  To my own sensibilities it seems low ethically to call a teacher to beg for a grade that your teenager didn't rightly earn.  There are many other lessons that can be learned from a bad grade.  Take advantage of these situations to teach your own child a lesson for a change.  Don't run headlong into a situation where you are effectively acting as a bully and a con-artist for your child.  Trying to levy influence against a teacher is cheap and petty. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »